Wednesday, August 26, 2009

What's The Difference?




6 comments:

  1. Do you suppose the day will come that we revere the bottom works of art the way we do the top?
    They say it was a means of communicating. Isn't the bottom a way of communicating also?
    I wonder, did the tribal leaders decry it as ruining the enviornment and arrest those they caught leaving thier mark on the wall?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder if they threatened to cut off the thumbs of the ones who pained/drew the pics in the top photo. That's what the Mayor of Vegas wanted to do to anyone who spraypainted/graffiti in Vegas.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I guess I'd say that today we think we own the land and can depict how all public places look. There's not all that much difference, is there...just a different perspective. Great photos, by the way!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well...one is all authentic and native and stuff.

    The other is an advertisement for Royal Caribbean cruise line.

    Am I right? Or am I right?

    ReplyDelete
  5. But, Lula, they are both a permanent record of who has been there, and what they were doing.

    ReplyDelete

Go ahead, stroke my ego. I'll wait.